<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expressing myself with dollar bills.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thatschurch.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thatschurch.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills</link>
	<description>Pittsburgh.  Only cooler.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:40:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blee</title>
		<link>http://thatschurch.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-13542</link>
		<dc:creator>blee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theburghblog.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/#comment-13542</guid>
		<description>#2: Since Many dance companies do shows with grants from public money it could be considered a public display of artistic expression.

Because of this you could group all forms of dancing as artistic expression and therefor covered under the general definition of art.

Being that many art exibits have sexual overtones (some even showing actual sex) you could make a decent argument.

Also, there is a right to open a business that could be constitutional based on &#039;The pursuit of happiness&#039; and its tie to monitary gains.

Besides, what does morality have to do with this? How many moral politicians have you met?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2: Since Many dance companies do shows with grants from public money it could be considered a public display of artistic expression.</p>
<p>Because of this you could group all forms of dancing as artistic expression and therefor covered under the general definition of art.</p>
<p>Being that many art exibits have sexual overtones (some even showing actual sex) you could make a decent argument.</p>
<p>Also, there is a right to open a business that could be constitutional based on &#8216;The pursuit of happiness&#8217; and its tie to monitary gains.</p>
<p>Besides, what does morality have to do with this? How many moral politicians have you met?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odd man out</title>
		<link>http://thatschurch.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-13454</link>
		<dc:creator>Odd man out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theburghblog.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/#comment-13454</guid>
		<description>Bottoms up? Ewwwwwwwwwww.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottoms up? Ewwwwwwwwwww&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spoon</title>
		<link>http://thatschurch.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-13434</link>
		<dc:creator>spoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theburghblog.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/#comment-13434</guid>
		<description>hey Kandyland!  I remember that place when it used to be behind the job center off State Street before they moved. It was no Jiggles though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Kandyland!  I remember that place when it used to be behind the job center off State Street before they moved. It was no Jiggles though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PittGirl fan</title>
		<link>http://thatschurch.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-13424</link>
		<dc:creator>PittGirl fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theburghblog.com/2007/03/20/expressing-myself-with-dollar-bills/#comment-13424</guid>
		<description>&quot;2.  How is nude dancing considered “constitutionally protected speech?”  Sometimes, I feel so stupid for not understanding this stuff.&quot;

That&#039;s OK, PittGirl, not many others understand this either. I guess that shakin&#039; your moneymaker is considered an &quot;artistic expression&quot;
More info here, from a rather sleazy law firm that specializes in defending clients from the adult industry...laywers...sheesh...

http://www.markskatz.com/kandyland.htm

To each his (or her) own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;2.  How is nude dancing considered “constitutionally protected speech?”  Sometimes, I feel so stupid for not understanding this stuff.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s OK, PittGirl, not many others understand this either. I guess that shakin&#8217; your moneymaker is considered an &#8220;artistic expression&#8221;<br />
More info here, from a rather sleazy law firm that specializes in defending clients from the adult industry&#8230;laywers&#8230;sheesh&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.markskatz.com/kandyland.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.markskatz.com/kandyland.htm</a></p>
<p>To each his (or her) own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
